Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Joachim Seybold and Andreas Lindner.
Connection Strength
1.532
-
Anterior nasal versus nasal mid-turbinate sampling for a SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test: does localisation or professional collection matter? Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Nov-Dec; 53(12):947-952.
Score: 0.241
-
Self-collected oral, nasal and saliva samples yield sensitivity comparable to professionally collected oro-nasopharyngeal swabs in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis among symptomatic outpatients. Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Sep; 110:261-266.
Score: 0.239
-
Diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of patient self-testing with a SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test. J Clin Virol. 2021 08; 141:104874.
Score: 0.237
-
Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with professional-collected nasal versus nasopharyngeal swab. Eur Respir J. 2021 05; 57(5).
Score: 0.236
-
Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with self-collected nasal swab versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab. Eur Respir J. 2021 04; 57(4).
Score: 0.235
-
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infections at a testing site in Berlin, Germany, March and April 2020-a cross-sectional study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Dec; 26(12):1685.e7-1685.e12.
Score: 0.225
-
Evaluation of accuracy, exclusivity, limit-of-detection and ease-of-use of LumiraDx™: An antigen-detecting point-of-care device for SARS-CoV-2. Infection. 2021 Aug 12.
Score: 0.060
-
The Abbott PanBio WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2-Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use. PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0247918.
Score: 0.059