Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Reem Mustafa and Elie Akl.
Connection Strength
1.287
-
Using GRADE in situations of emergencies and urgencies: certainty in evidence and recommendations matters during the COVID-19 pandemic, now more than ever and no matter what. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 11; 127:202-207.
Score: 0.221
-
Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 07; 99:14-23.
Score: 0.189
-
GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jul; 87:14-22.
Score: 0.179
-
An educational game for teaching clinical practice guidelines to Internal Medicine residents: development, feasibility and acceptability. BMC Med Educ. 2008 Nov 18; 8:50.
Score: 0.099
-
American Society of Hematology living guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19: May 2021 update on the use of intermediate-intensity anticoagulation in critically ill patients. Blood Adv. 2021 10 26; 5(20):3951-3959.
Score: 0.061
-
American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19. Blood Adv. 2021 02 09; 5(3):872-888.
Score: 0.058
-
Use of facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 10; 8(10):954-955.
Score: 0.056
-
GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 07; 111:69-82.
Score: 0.050
-
A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADE. Environ Int. 2019 01; 122:168-184.
Score: 0.050
-
GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 07; 111:83-93.
Score: 0.048
-
Do clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 07; 99:33-40.
Score: 0.047
-
GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 07; 111:94-104.
Score: 0.047
-
GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 07; 111:105-114.
Score: 0.047
-
Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 02; 15(1):52.
Score: 0.045
-
Stakeholders apply the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework to facilitate coverage decisions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jun; 86:129-139.
Score: 0.044
-
Systematic survey of randomized trials evaluating the impact of alternative diagnostic strategies on patient-important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Apr; 84:61-69.
Score: 0.044