Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Cesare Hassan and Alessandro Repici.
Cesare Hassan
Connection Strength
16.942
Alessandro Repici
  1. New artificial intelligence system: first validation study versus experienced endoscopists for colorectal polyp detection. Gut. 2020 05; 69(5):799-800.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.847
  2. En Bloc Resection for 10-20 mm Polyps to Reduce Post Colonoscopy Cancer and Surveillance. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 10; 17(11):2173-2175.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.818
  3. Efficacy of Per-oral Methylene Blue Formulation for Screening Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2019 06; 156(8):2198-2207.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.808
  4. Intensive post-polypectomy surveillance: Too much for too little? Dig Endosc. 2019 Jan; 31(1):24-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.795
  5. Diagnostic yield and miss rate of EndoRings in an organized colorectal cancer screening program: the SMART (Study Methodology for ADR-Related Technology) trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 03; 89(3):583-590.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.792
  6. New technology for the old polyp: Does the benefit justify the cost? Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 07; 88(1):117-118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.775
  7. How to Ensure Patient Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance in Your Practice. Gastroenterology. 2018 08; 155(2):252-257.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.775
  8. Evaluation of genotoxicity related to oral methylene blue chromoendoscopy. Endoscopy. 2018 10; 50(10):1027-1032.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.772
  9. Colorectal polyp snaring: the smaller, the colder, the bigger! Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 04; 87(4):1104-1105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.761
  10. Postsurgery risk for nonmalignant colorectal polyps: the ultimate call. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 01; 87(1):251-253.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.749
  11. Propofol in Screening Colonoscopy: Point of Strength or Weakness? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 12; 209(6):W407.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.744
  12. GERD after per-oral endoscopic myotomy as compared with Heller's myotomy with fundoplication: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Apr; 87(4):934-943.e18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.740
  13. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy and hypokalemia: at the heart of the problem! Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 10; 86(4):680-683.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.736
  14. Defeating Cancer by Boosting the Adenoma Detection Rate: The Circle of Life. Gastroenterology. 2017 07; 153(1):8-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.718
  15. Recent Advances in Diagnostic Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Update for Radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jul; 209(1):88-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.711
  16. Polypectomy: No training, No cancer prevention! Endosc Int Open. 2017 Mar; 5(3):E198-E200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.706
  17. Standard needle versus needleless injection modality: animal study on different fluids for submucosal elevation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Sep; 86(3):553-558.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.703
  18. What gastroenterologists should know about SARS-CoV 2 vaccine: World Endoscopy Organization perspective. United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 09; 9(7):787-796.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.237
  19. Recovery of endoscopy services in the era of COVID-19: recommendations from an international Delphi consensus. Gut. 2020 11; 69(11):1915-1924.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  20. Endoscopy Units and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak: A Multicenter Experience From Italy. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jul; 159(1):363-366.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  21. Multi-band mucosectomy for neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus: in vivo comparison between two different devices. Surg Endosc. 2020 09; 34(9):3845-3852.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  22. NER1006 is clinically safe. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 04; 89(4):908-909.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  23. Cold snare endoscopic resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and pooled-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 05; 89(5):929-936.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  24. New and Recurrent Colorectal Cancers After Resection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Endoscopic Surveillance Studies. Gastroenterology. 2019 Apr; 156(5):1309-1323.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  25. Cost analysis and outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions in an outpatient setting. Dig Liver Dis. 2019 03; 51(3):391-396.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  26. A novel submucosal injection solution for endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions: a randomized, double-blind trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep; 88(3):527-535.e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  27. EUS elastography (strain ratio) and fractal-based quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jun; 87(6):1464-1473.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  28. Efficacy and safety of SIC-8000 (Eleview®) for submucosal injection for endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in an in vivo porcine model. Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Mar; 50(3):260-266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  29. BASIC (BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification) classification for colorectal polyp characterization with blue light imaging. Endoscopy. 2018 03; 50(3):211-220.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  30. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy is associated with a lower adenoma miss rate: a multicenter randomized tandem study. Endoscopy. 2017 Nov; 49(11):1051-1060.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  31. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul; 86(1):74-86.e17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  32. FIT and M2-PK: a marriage of convenience! Intern Emerg Med. 2017 04; 12(3):281-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  33. New paradigms for colonoscopic management of diminutive colorectal polyps: predict, resect, and discard or do not resect? Clin Endosc. 2013 Mar; 46(2):130-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  34. Improvement in appropriateness and diagnostic yield of fast-track endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Northern Italy. Endoscopy. 2021 Feb; 53(2):162-165.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  35. COVID-19 and endoscopic management of superficial gastrointestinal neoplastic lesions: a multinational cross-sectional survey. Endoscopy. 2021 Feb; 53(2):173-177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  36. Impact of Electronic Chromoendoscopy on Adenoma Miss Rates During Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 09; 62(9):1124-1134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  37. Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope clips for gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2019 10; 51(10):941-949.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  38. Hot snare vs. cold snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of 4 - 10 mm colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Endosc Int Open. 2019 May; 7(5):E708-E716.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  39. Divergent Long-Term Detection Rates of Proximal and Distal Advanced Neoplasia in Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Programs: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2018 11 06; 169(9):602-609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  40. Increasing adenoma detection rates in the right side of the colon comparing retroflexion with a second forward view: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 03; 89(3):453-459.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  41. Preparation for colonoscopy: Recommendations by an expert panel in Italy. Dig Liver Dis. 2018 11; 50(11):1124-1132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  42. Periendoscopic management of direct oral anticoagulants: a prospective cohort study. Gut. 2019 06; 68(6):969-976.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  43. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy. 2019 01; 51(1):73-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  44. Water exchange colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 10; 88(4):589-597.e11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  45. High-definition colonoscopy versus Endocuff versus EndoRings versus full-spectrum endoscopy for adenoma detection at colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 08; 88(2):335-344.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  46. Why attempt en bloc resection of non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas? A systematic review of the prevalence of superficial submucosal invasive cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut. 2018 08; 67(8):1464-1474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  47. Long-term performance of colorectal cancerscreening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test. Gut. 2018 12; 67(12):2124-2130.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  48. Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on detection of proximal colon adenomas: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug; 86(2):274-281.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  49. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017 Mar; 49(3):270-297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  50. Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy. 2017 Feb; 49(2):191-198.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  51. Brachytherapy for the palliation of dysphagia owing to esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Radiother Oncol. 2017 03; 122(3):332-339.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.