Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by David Stuckler and Martin Mckee.
Connection Strength

21.574
  1. Are Populist Leaders Creating the Conditions for the Spread of COVID-19? Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties' Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe". Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Aug 01; 10(8):511-515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.959
  2. Scientific divisions on covid-19: not what they might seem. BMJ. 2020 10 19; 371:m4024.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.909
  3. If the world fails to protect the economy, COVID-19 will damage health not just now but also in the future. Nat Med. 2020 05; 26(5):640-642.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.880
  4. McKee and Stuckler Respond. Am J Public Health. 2019 02; 109(2):e1-e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.807
  5. The hidden power of corporations. BMJ. 2019 Jan 09; 364:l4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.803
  6. McKee and Stuckler Respond. Am J Public Health. 2018 12; 108(12):e29-e30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.798
  7. How the Internet Risks Widening Health Inequalities. Am J Public Health. 2018 09; 108(9):1178-1179.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.784
  8. Revisiting the Corporate and Commercial Determinants of Health. Am J Public Health. 2018 09; 108(9):1167-1170.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.777
  9. Letter to the editors. J Public Health Policy. 2018 05; 39(2):258-259.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.766
  10. Complexity and conflicts of interest statements: a case-study of emails exchanged between Coca-Cola and the principal investigators of the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE). J Public Health Policy. 2018 Feb; 39(1):49-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.753
  11. Health and Wealth in the United States and England-Two Very Different Countries With Similar Findings. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 12 01; 177(12):1753-1754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.744
  12. "Enemies of the People?" Public Health in the Era of Populist Politics Comment on "The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy". Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 11 01; 6(11):669-672.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.740
  13. Austerity and health: the impact in the UK and Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2017 10 01; 27(suppl_4):18-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.736
  14. Social and economic multipliers: What they are and why they are important for health policy in Europe. Scand J Public Health. 2017 08; 45(18_suppl):17-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.727
  15. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals programme: a quasi-experiment in giving hope to migrants. Lancet Public Health. 2017 04; 2(4):e160-e161.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.708
  16. Authors' reply to Sousa-Pinto. BMJ. 2017 03 09; 356:j1223.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.707
  17. Living on the edge: precariousness and why it matters for health. Arch Public Health. 2017; 75:13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.707
  18. A trade deal between the United Kingdom and United States. BMJ. 2017 Jan 30; 356:j491.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.702
  19. What will Donald Trump's presidency mean for health? A scorecard. Lancet. 2017 02 18; 389(10070):748-754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.701
  20. Health effects of the financial crisis: lessons from Greece. Lancet Public Health. 2016 12; 1(2):e40-e41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.691
  21. How government spending cuts put lives at risk. Nature. 2010 May 20; 465(7296):289.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.441
  22. Prevalence and changes in food-related hardships by socioeconomic and demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A longitudinal panel study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jul; 6:100125.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.238
  23. Free licensing of vaccines to end the COVID-19 crisis. Lancet. 2021 04 03; 397(10281):1261-1262.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  24. COVID-19 and the collapse of global trade: building an effective public health response. Lancet Planet Health. 2021 02; 5(2):e102-e107.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  25. Using volunteered geographic information to assess mobility in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-city time series analysis of 41 cities in 22 countries from March 2nd to 26th 2020. Global Health. 2020 09 23; 16(1):85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  26. Is the COVID-19 pandemic turning into a European food crisis? Eur J Public Health. 2020 08 01; 30(4):626-627.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  27. Softening the blow of the pandemic: will the International Monetary Fund and World Bank make things worse? Lancet Glob Health. 2020 06; 8(6):e758-e759.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  28. Assessing the health effects of a "no deal" Brexit. BMJ. 2019 Aug 29; 366:l5300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  29. Author Response to "Testing Causal Assumptions in Obesity Research". Am J Prev Med. 2019 02; 56(2):332-333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  30. Google Trends: Opportunities and limitations in health and health policy research. Health Policy. 2019 03; 123(3):338-341.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  31. Trade challenges at the World Trade Organization to national noncommunicable disease prevention policies: A thematic document analysis of trade and health policy space. PLoS Med. 2018 06; 15(6):e1002590.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  32. The Impact of U.S. Free Trade Agreements on Calorie Availability and Obesity: A Natural Experiment in Canada. Am J Prev Med. 2018 05; 54(5):637-643.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  33. Coca-Cola - a model of transparency in research partnerships? A network analysis of Coca-Cola's research funding (2008-2016). Public Health Nutr. 2018 06; 21(9):1594-1607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  34. Inequalities in the use of secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease by socioeconomic status: evidence from the PURE observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 03; 6(3):e292-e301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  35. Does greater individual social capital improve the management of hypertension? Cross-national analysis of 61 229 individuals in 21 countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2017; 2(4):e000443.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  36. Devolution of power, revolution in public health? J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 12 01; 39(4):877.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  37. The impact of economic downturns and budget cuts on homelessness claim rates across 323 local authorities in England, 2004-12. J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 12 01; 39(4):874.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  38. Patterns of mortality by occupation in the UK, 1991-2011: a comparative analysis of linked census and mortality records. Lancet Public Health. 2017 Nov; 2(11):e501-e512.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  39. How will Brexit affect health and health services in the UK? Evaluating three possible scenarios. Lancet. 2017 Nov 04; 390(10107):2110-2118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  40. Tougher charging regime for "overseas" patients. BMJ. 2017 09 08; 358:j4091.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  41. Economic insecurity during the Great Recession and metabolic, inflammatory and liver function biomarkers: analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 10; 71(10):1005-1013.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  42. Economic insecurity during the Great Recession and metabolic, inflammatory and liver function biomarkers: analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Aug 28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  43. Impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement on high-fructose corn syrup supply in Canada: a natural experiment using synthetic control methods. CMAJ. 2017 Jul 04; 189(26):E881-E887.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  44. Corrigendum: Time-discounting and tobacco smoking: a systematic review and network analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2017 06 01; 46(3):869.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  45. The health impact of trade and investment agreements: a quantitative systematic review and network co-citation analysis. Global Health. 2017 03 08; 13(1):13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  46. Evidence Points To 'Gaming' At Hospitals Subject To National Health Service Cleanliness Inspections. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 02 01; 36(2):355-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  47. Outsourcing cleaning services increases MRSA incidence: Evidence from 126 english acute trusts. Soc Sci Med. 2017 02; 174:64-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  48. The impact of housing payment problems on health status during economic recession: A comparative analysis of longitudinal EU SILC data of 27 European states, 2008-2010. SSM Popul Health. 2016 Dec; 2:306-316.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  49. Addressing institutional amplifiers in the dynamics and control of tuberculosis epidemics. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Jan; 84(1):30-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  50. Economic shocks and health resilience: lessons from the Russian Federation. J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 12 01; 39(4):875.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  51. The effect of rapid privatisation on mortality in mono-industrial towns in post-Soviet Russia: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2017 May; 2(5):e231-e238.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  52. The IMF and government health expenditure: A response to Sanjeev Gupta. Soc Sci Med. 2017 05; 181:202-204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  53. National sex work policy and HIV prevalence among sex workers: an ecological regression analysis of 27 European countries. Lancet HIV. 2017 03; 4(3):e134-e140.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  54. The impact of IMF conditionality on government health expenditure: A cross-national analysis of 16 West African nations. Soc Sci Med. 2017 02; 174:220-227.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  55. Economic shocks and health resilience: lessons from the Russian Federation. J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Dec 02; 38(4):e409-e418.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  56. Social protection and tuberculosis control in 21 European countries, 1995-2012: a cross-national statistical modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Nov; 14(11):1105-1112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  57. UN High-Level Meeting on Non-Communicable Diseases: addressing four questions. Lancet. 2011 Jul 30; 378(9789):449-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.