Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Lukasz Szarpak and Kurt Ruetzler.
Connection Strength

8.653
  1. Pediatric intravascular access in simulated COVID-19 patients among paramedics wearing personal protective equipment. Resusc Plus. 2021 Mar; 5:100073.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.921
  2. Comparison of 4 Pediatric Intraosseous Access Devices: A Randomized Simulation Study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Oct; 36(10):e568-e572.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.906
  3. Respiratory protection among healthcare workers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in COVID-19 patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 01; 39:233.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.881
  4. Comparison of the UEScope videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, cross-over, multi-center manikin study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep; 97(36):e12085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.784
  5. D-dimer levels predict COVID-19 severity and mortality. Kardiol Pol. 2021 02 25; 79(2):217-218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  6. Intraosseous versus intravenous access while wearing personal protective equipment: a meta-analysis in the era of COVID-19. Kardiol Pol. 2021 03 25; 79(3):277-286.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  7. Lactate dehydrogenase level as a COVID-19 severity marker. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 07; 45:638-639.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  8. An optimal chest compression technique using personal protective equipment during resuscitation in the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized crossover simulation study. Kardiol Pol. 2020 12 23; 78(12):1254-1261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.227
  9. Resuscitation of the patient with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 when wearing personal protective equipment: A randomized multicenter crossover simulation trial. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(5):497-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  10. Dilemmas in resuscitation of COVID-19 patients based on current evidence. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(3):327-328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  11. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(2):216-217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  12. ECG pre-hospital teletransmission by emergency teams staffed with an emergency physician and paramedics and its impact on transportation and hospital admission. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug; 98(34):e16636.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  13. The TrueCPR device in the process of teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized simulation trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul; 98(27):e15995.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  14. Comparison of blind intubation via supraglottic airway devices versus standard intubation during different airway emergency scenarios in inexperienced hand: Randomized, crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  15. Thyromental height test as a new method for prediction of difficult intubation with double lumen tube. PLoS One. 2018; 13(9):e0201944.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  16. A Novel Method of Newborn Chest Compression: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Study. Front Pediatr. 2018; 6:159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  17. Is there any alternative to standard chest compression techniques in infants? A randomized manikin trial of the new "2-thumb-fist" option. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb; 97(5):e9386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  18. ET-View compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017; 49(4):274-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  19. Exchange of supraglottic airways for endotracheal tube using the Eschmann Introducer during simulated child resuscitation: A randomized study comparing 4 devices. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun; 96(26):e7177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  20. Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul; 176(7):865-871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  21. A comparison of McGrath MACĀ® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  22. A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct; 35(10):1420-1425.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  23. Evaluation of a newly developed infant chest compression technique: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr; 96(14):e5915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  24. Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr; 96(16):e5873.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  25. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug; 35(8):1142-1146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  26. New method of infant chest compression. Authors response. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 05; 35(5):795.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  27. Evaluation of new two-thumb chest compression technique for infant CPR performed by novice physicians. A randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr; 35(4):604-609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  28. How the COVID-19 pandemic changed treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a single cardiac center experience. J Thorac Dis. 2021 Feb; 13(2):906-917.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  29. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Prone Position: A Good Option for Patients With COVID-19. Anesth Analg. 2020 09; 131(3):e172-e173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  30. Role of Mask/Respirator Protection Against SARS-CoV-2. Anesth Analg. 2020 07; 131(1):e33-e34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  31. Endovascular treatment of complex diseases of the thoracic aorta-10 years single centre experience. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jun; 11(6):2240-2250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  32. Descriptive review of patent ductus arteriosus ligation by video-assisted thoracoscopy in pediatric population: 7-year experience. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jun; 11(6):2555-2563.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  33. A multicenter survey on toxoplasmosis knowledge among pregnant women in Poland (the TOWER study). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 03; 18(1):389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  34. An innovative panel to assess endothelial integrity of pedicled and skeletonized internal thoracic artery used as aortocoronary bypass graft: a randomized comparative histologic and immunohistochemical study. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Aug; 10(8):4865-4873.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  35. Comparison of different methods of postoperative analgesia after thoracotomy-a randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Aug; 10(8):4874-4882.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  36. Prototype of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy simulator used in regional ECMO program. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Aug; 10(8):5073-5079.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  37. Assessment of changes of regional ventilation distribution in the lung tissue depending on the driving pressure applied during high frequency jet ventilation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 07 31; 18(1):101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  38. Which position should we take during newborn resuscitation? A prospective, randomised, multicentre simulation trial. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(6):980-986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  39. The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(3):574-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.