Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Lukasz Szarpak and Jacek Smereka.
Connection Strength

17.857
  1. Airway management and ventilation principles in COVID-19 patients. J Clin Anesth. 2020 10; 65:109877.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.883
  2. The use of personal protective equipment in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 07; 38(7):1529-1530.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.877
  3. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(2):216-217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.877
  4. COVID 19 a challenge for emergency medicine and every health care professional. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 10; 38(10):2232-2233.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.873
  5. Resuscitation in COVID-19 pandemic. Authors' replay. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(5):658-659.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.860
  6. Medical emergencies in dental hygienists' practice. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul; 98(30):e16613.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.830
  7. Preparedness and attitudes towards medical emergencies in the dental office among Polish dentists. Int Dent J. 2019 Aug; 69(4):321-328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.812
  8. Evaluation of a newly developed infant chest compression technique: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr; 96(14):e5915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.711
  9. Comparison of the Intubrite and Macintosh laryngoscopes in a difficult airway scenario. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 06; 35(6):925.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.710
  10. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug; 35(8):1142-1146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.708
  11. The quality of a newly developed infant chest compression method applied by paramedics: a randomised crossover manikin trial. Kardiol Pol. 2017; 75(6):589-595.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.703
  12. Should we supplement zinc in COVID-19 patients? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021 09 30; 131(9):802-807.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.238
  13. Comparison of intravascular access methods applied by nurses wearing personal protective equipment in simulated COVID-19 resuscitation: A randomized crossover simulation trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 11; 49:189-194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.237
  14. Characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in COVID-19. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(4):503-508.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  15. Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Rate: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 15; 10(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  16. Intraosseous versus intravenous access while wearing personal protective equipment: a meta-analysis in the era of COVID-19. Kardiol Pol. 2021 03 25; 79(3):277-286.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  17. Evidence of diagnostic value of ferritin in patients with COVID-19. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(6):886-887.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  18. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by emergency medical service teams during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(1):15-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  19. An optimal chest compression technique using personal protective equipment during resuscitation in the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized crossover simulation study. Kardiol Pol. 2020 12 23; 78(12):1254-1261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.227
  20. Comparison of 4 Pediatric Intraosseous Access Devices: A Randomized Simulation Study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Oct; 36(10):e568-e572.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  21. Vie scope® laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope with personal protective equipment during intubation of COVID-19 resuscitation patient. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 08; 46:788-789.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  22. Role of Mask/Respirator Protection Against SARS-CoV-2. Anesth Analg. 2020 07; 131(1):e33-e34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  23. Kawasaki disease shock syndrome or toxic shock syndrome in children and the relationship with COVID-19. Med Hypotheses. 2020 Nov; 144:109986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  24. Resuscitation of the patient with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 when wearing personal protective equipment: A randomized multicenter crossover simulation trial. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(5):497-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  25. Dilemmas in resuscitation of COVID-19 patients based on current evidence. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(3):327-328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  26. Respiratory protection among healthcare workers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in COVID-19 patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 01; 39:233.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  27. COVID-19 in healthcare workers. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 01; 39:236.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  28. Which intravascular access should we use in patients with suspected/confirmed COVID-19? Resuscitation. 2020 06; 151:8-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  29. COVID-19 challenge for modern medicine. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(2):175-183.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  30. Cloth masks versus medical masks for COVID-19 protection. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(2):218-219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  31. How should we teach cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Randomized multi-center study. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(3):439-445.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  32. Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial. Emerg Med Int. 2019; 2019:7306204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  33. ECG pre-hospital teletransmission by emergency teams staffed with an emergency physician and paramedics and its impact on transportation and hospital admission. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug; 98(34):e16636.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  34. The TrueCPR device in the process of teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized simulation trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul; 98(27):e15995.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  35. A multicenter survey on toxoplasmosis knowledge among pregnant women in Poland (the TOWER study). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 03; 18(1):389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  36. Comparison of blind intubation via supraglottic airway devices versus standard intubation during different airway emergency scenarios in inexperienced hand: Randomized, crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  37. Comparison of the UEScope videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, cross-over, multi-center manikin study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep; 97(36):e12085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  38. A Novel Method of Newborn Chest Compression: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Study. Front Pediatr. 2018; 6:159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  39. Is there any alternative to standard chest compression techniques in infants? A randomized manikin trial of the new "2-thumb-fist" option. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb; 97(5):e9386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  40. Which position should we take during newborn resuscitation? A prospective, randomised, multicentre simulation trial. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(6):980-986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  41. Factors influencing high-quality chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario, according to 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(3):642-647.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  42. The impact of a CPRezy™ feedback device on the quality of chest compressions performed by nurses. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 07; 36(7):1318-1319.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  43. In-hospital sudden cardiac arrest protocol analysis. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(2):376-380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  44. Comparison of 3 Times a Week 4- and 5-Hour In-Center Hemodialysis Sessions with Use of Continuous Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring. Ann Transplant. 2017 Jun 06; 22:346-353.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  45. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  46. A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct; 35(10):1420-1425.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  47. Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr; 96(16):e5873.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  48. The LMA Fastrach® as a conduit for endotracheal intubation during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 07; 35(7):1020-1021.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  49. Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for intubation performed by novice physicians in a difficult airway scenario. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May; 35(5):796-797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  50. New method of infant chest compression. Authors response. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 05; 35(5):795.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  51. Evaluation of new two-thumb chest compression technique for infant CPR performed by novice physicians. A randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr; 35(4):604-609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  52. D-dimer levels predict COVID-19 severity and mortality. Kardiol Pol. 2021 02 25; 79(2):217-218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  53. Comparative effectiveness of N95 respirators and surgical/face masks in preventing airborne infections in the era of SARS-CoV2 pandemic: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0242901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  54. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Prone Position: A Good Option for Patients With COVID-19. Anesth Analg. 2020 09; 131(3):e172-e173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  55. Do pets protect their owners in the COVID-19 era? Med Hypotheses. 2020 09; 142:109831.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  56. Place of prefilled syringes in COVID-19 patient based on current evidence. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 01; 39:234-235.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  57. Evaluating Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Ultrasound. Emerg Med Int. 2019; 2019:5361620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  58. An analysis of the relationship between the applied medical rescue actions and the return of spontaneous circulation in adults with out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul; 97(30):e11607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  59. A comparison of comfort assessment of NECKLITE vs. NeXsplint cervical collar. Pilot data. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 11; 36(11):2127-2128.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  60. The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(3):574-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  61. Descending aorta dissection with angina treated successfully by stent graft implantation. Cardiol J. 2018; 25(6):751-752.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  62. Which position for resuscitation should we take? A randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 May; 36(5):899-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  63. ET-View compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017; 49(4):274-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  64. Comparison of four laryngoscopes in cervical immobilization scenario. Pilot data. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 05; 36(5):890-891.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  65. Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul; 176(7):865-871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  66. Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via the iGEL for Intubation With C-spine immobilization: A Randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar; 35(3):484-487.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.