Connection

Kurt Ruetzler to Cross-Over Studies

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kurt Ruetzler has written about Cross-Over Studies.
Connection Strength

1.053
  1. Comparison of the UEScope videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, cross-over, multi-center manikin study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep; 97(36):e12085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  2. ET-View compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017; 49(4):274-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  3. Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul; 176(7):865-871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  4. A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct; 35(10):1420-1425.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  5. Evaluation of new two-thumb chest compression technique for infant CPR performed by novice physicians. A randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr; 35(4):604-609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  6. An optimal chest compression technique using personal protective equipment during resuscitation in the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized crossover simulation study. Kardiol Pol. 2020 12 23; 78(12):1254-1261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  7. Resuscitation of the patient with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 when wearing personal protective equipment: A randomized multicenter crossover simulation trial. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(5):497-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  8. Comparison of blind intubation via supraglottic airway devices versus standard intubation during different airway emergency scenarios in inexperienced hand: Randomized, crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  9. Assessment of changes of regional ventilation distribution in the lung tissue depending on the driving pressure applied during high frequency jet ventilation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 07 31; 18(1):101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  10. Is there any alternative to standard chest compression techniques in infants? A randomized manikin trial of the new "2-thumb-fist" option. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb; 97(5):e9386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  11. Which position should we take during newborn resuscitation? A prospective, randomised, multicentre simulation trial. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(6):980-986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  12. Exchange of supraglottic airways for endotracheal tube using the Eschmann Introducer during simulated child resuscitation: A randomized study comparing 4 devices. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun; 96(26):e7177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  13. A comparison of McGrath MACĀ® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  14. Evaluation of a newly developed infant chest compression technique: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr; 96(14):e5915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  15. Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr; 96(16):e5873.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  16. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug; 35(8):1142-1146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.