Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Kurt Ruetzler and Jerzy Ladny.
Connection Strength

2.281
  1. D-dimer levels predict COVID-19 severity and mortality. Kardiol Pol. 2021 02 25; 79(2):217-218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  2. Comparison of 4 Pediatric Intraosseous Access Devices: A Randomized Simulation Study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Oct; 36(10):e568-e572.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.226
  3. Comparison of the UEScope videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, cross-over, multi-center manikin study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep; 97(36):e12085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  4. A Novel Method of Newborn Chest Compression: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Study. Front Pediatr. 2018; 6:159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  5. Is there any alternative to standard chest compression techniques in infants? A randomized manikin trial of the new "2-thumb-fist" option. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb; 97(5):e9386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  6. The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(3):574-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  7. ET-View compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017; 49(4):274-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  8. Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul; 176(7):865-871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  9. A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct; 35(10):1420-1425.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  10. Intraosseous versus intravenous access while wearing personal protective equipment: a meta-analysis in the era of COVID-19. Kardiol Pol. 2021 03 25; 79(3):277-286.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  11. An optimal chest compression technique using personal protective equipment during resuscitation in the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized crossover simulation study. Kardiol Pol. 2020 12 23; 78(12):1254-1261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  12. Resuscitation of the patient with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 when wearing personal protective equipment: A randomized multicenter crossover simulation trial. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(5):497-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  13. Dilemmas in resuscitation of COVID-19 patients based on current evidence. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(3):327-328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  14. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(2):216-217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  15. ECG pre-hospital teletransmission by emergency teams staffed with an emergency physician and paramedics and its impact on transportation and hospital admission. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug; 98(34):e16636.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  16. Comparison of blind intubation via supraglottic airway devices versus standard intubation during different airway emergency scenarios in inexperienced hand: Randomized, crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  17. Which position should we take during newborn resuscitation? A prospective, randomised, multicentre simulation trial. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(6):980-986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  18. Evaluation of a newly developed infant chest compression technique: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr; 96(14):e5915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  19. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug; 35(8):1142-1146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.