Connection

Sheraz Markar to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Sheraz Markar has written about Humans.
Sheraz Markar
Connection Strength
0.159
Humans
  1. An International Comparison of the Management of Gastrointestinal Surgical Emergencies in Octogenarians-England Versus United States: A National Population-based Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2021 05 01; 273(5):924-932.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  2. Changing the Paradigm of Surgical Research During a Pandemic. Ann Surg. 2020 08; 272(2):e170-e171.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  3. Practice patterns of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during the initial COVID-19 outbreak in England. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 09; 5(9):804-805.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  4. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2019 Nov 13; 32(9).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  5. Management of achalasia in 2019. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2019 07; 35(4):356-362.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  6. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2019 04 25; 380(17):e28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  7. Response "Surgeon Age in Relation to Prognosis After Esophageal Cancer Resection". Ann Surg. 2019 01; 269(1):e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  8. A population-based cohort study examining the risk of abdominal cancer after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun; 69(6):1776-1785.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  9. The Influence of Antireflux Surgery on Esophageal Cancer Risk in England: National Population-based Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2018 11; 268(5):861-867.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  10. Surgeon Age in Relation to Prognosis After Esophageal Cancer Resection. Ann Surg. 2018 07; 268(1):100-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  11. Assessment of a Noninvasive Exhaled Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Oesophagogastric Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018 07 01; 4(7):970-976.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  12. Emergency Presentation of Esophagogastric Cancer: Predictors and Long-term Prognosis. Ann Surg. 2018 04; 267(4):711-715.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  13. Endoscopic Pneumatic Dilation for Esophageal Achalasia. Am Surg. 2018 Apr 01; 84(4):473-476.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  14. Early esophageal cancer. A western perspective. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2018 Oct; 96(8):463-465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  15. Effect of Esophageal Cancer Surgeon Volume on Management and Mortality From Emergency Upper Gastrointestinal Conditions: Population-based Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2017 11; 266(5):847-853.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  16. Discrepancy Between Clinical and Pathologic Nodal Status of Esophageal Cancer and Impact on Prognosis and Therapeutic Strategy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec; 24(13):3911-3920.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  17. Surgically treated oesophageal cancer developed in a radiated field: Impact on peri-operative and long-term outcomes. Eur J Cancer. 2017 04; 75:179-189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. Assessment of a multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative pneumonia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vascular. 2009 Jan-Feb; 17(1):36-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  19. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Adult Surgical Patients and Surgical Services: An International Multi-center Cohort Study and Department Survey. Ann Surg. 2021 12 01; 274(6):904-912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  20. The Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Public Health Information Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 07 08; 7(7):e29942.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  21. Using a Secure, Continually Updating, Web Source Processing Pipeline to Support the Real-Time Data Synthesis and Analysis of Scientific Literature: Development and Validation Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021 05 06; 23(5):e25714.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  22. The PanSurg-PREDICT Study: Endocrine Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic. World J Surg. 2021 08; 45(8):2315-2324.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  23. Determinants of burnout and other aspects of psychological well-being in healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic: A multinational cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0238666.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  24. A national survey assessing public readiness for digital health strategies against COVID-19 within the United Kingdom. Sci Rep. 2021 03 16; 11(1):5958.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  25. New geographic model of care to manage the post-COVID-19 elective surgery aftershock in England: a retrospective observational study. BMJ Open. 2020 10 31; 10(10):e042392.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  26. Insights from a global snapshot of the change in elective colorectal practice due to the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0240397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  27. What Has Been the Impact of Covid-19 on Safety Culture? A Case Study from a Large Metropolitan Healthcare Trust. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 09 25; 17(19).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  28. Surgical challenges and research priorities in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic: EAES membership survey. Surg Endosc. 2020 10; 34(10):4225-4232.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  29. Health-related Quality of Life Following Hybrid Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer, Analysis of a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Controlled Trial: The MIRO Trial. Ann Surg. 2020 06; 271(6):1023-1029.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  30. An international comparison of the utilisation of and outcomes from minimal access surgery for the treatment of common abdominal surgical emergencies. Surg Endosc. 2020 05; 34(5):2012-2018.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  31. Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Yield on Overall Survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2019 02; 269(2):261-268.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  32. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 01 10; 380(2):152-162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  33. The surgical management of non-malignant aerodigestive fistula. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Nov 15; 13(1):113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  34. Cancer risk after bariatric surgery - is colorectal cancer a special case? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 11; 15(11):653-654.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  35. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. BMJ. 2018 Oct 25; 363:k4023.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  36. Surgeon Volume and Surgeon Age in Relation to Proficiency Gain Curves for Prognosis Following Surgery for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb; 26(2):497-505.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  37. A novel method of 'hands-free' laparoscopic retraction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Apr; 101(4):304-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  38. Variation in Exhaled Acetone and Other Ketones in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Prospective Cross-sectional Study. Obes Surg. 2018 08; 28(8):2439-2446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  39. Evolution in the management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly: population-based cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2018 10; 32(10):4078-4086.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  40. Laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer: an English national population-based cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2018 09; 32(9):3783-3788.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  41. Laparoscopic Lavage Versus Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018 02; 267(2):252-258.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  42. An observational study of the timing of surgery, use of laparoscopy and outcomes for acute cholecystitis in the USA and UK. Surg Endosc. 2018 07; 32(7):3055-3063.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  43. Induced Bias Due to Crossover Within Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgical Oncology: A Meta-regression Analysis of Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan; 25(1):221-230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  44. Prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology in staging gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer. 2018 Jan; 21(1):10-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  45. Use of Tumor Markers in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Surgeon Perceptions and Cost-Benefit Trade-Off Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May; 24(5):1165-1173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  46. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in older patients. Arch Surg. 2012 Jun; 147(6):557-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.